In EMR research, the source of funding strongly predicts study outcomes.
Why Independence Matters
The telecommunications industry has a vested interest in technologies being perceived as safe. Industry funding can introduce subtle biases in research questions, methodology, data interpretation, and publication decisions.
The Funding Effect
Henry Lai's systematic analysis found:
- 70-80% of independent studies report biological effects
- 70-80% of industry-funded studies report no effects
This pattern has been documented across multiple fields including tobacco and pharmaceuticals.
Limitations of Peer Review
Peer review cannot fully protect against funding bias, especially when reviewers share similar viewpoints. A critical approach considering funding sources remains essential.